The Supreme Court Collegium has decided that Justice Yashwant Verma will be transferred – from the Delhi High Court back to Allahabad. Sources told NDTV the decision was made after a large amount of unaccounted cash was found in his official bungalow in Delhi last week, during Holi vacations.
The money was discovered after a fire broke out in the building and family members of the judge – who was not in the city at the time – called emergency services, who then called the police.
On being informed of the matter as it travelled up through official channels, the Collegium, headed by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna decided to transfer Justice Verma.
Justice Verma has not yet responded to the recovery of the cash and, according to news agency PTI, did not hold court today. Sources told PTI he had gone “on leave”.
Sources said the Chief Justice took a very serious view of the discovery of the cash and the five-member Collegium concurred, agreeing unanimously on Justice Verma’s transfer.
But sources also said some members felt stricter action was required to avoid tarnishing the reputation of the judiciary, which would have serious consequences on its ability to deliver justice to the people.
There was, therefore, also talk of Justice Verma being asked to resign.
Should he refuse to do so, some of the Collegium felt, an internal inquiry could be initiated by the Chief Justice; this would be the first step in his being removed by Parliament.
‘Everyone Demoralised’: Delhi Chief Justice
Delhi High Court Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya, responding to senior advocate Arun Bhardwaj mentioning this matter in court, admitted that everyone had been left “shaken” by the incident.
“Today’s incident has pained many of us. Please take some steps on the administrative side so these incidents do not happen in future and the judicial system is maintained…” Mr Bhardwaj said.
How Can High Court Judges Be Removed?
In 1999 the Supreme Court laid down guidelines to deal with allegations of corruption, wrongdoing, and judicial irregularity against judges of the Constitutional Court.
According to these guidelines, on receiving a complaint the Chief Justice will first seek a reply from the judge concerned. If he is dissatisfied with the answer, or believes the matter requires further investigation, he will form an internal committee.
This committee will consist of one Supreme Court judge and two High Court Chief Justices.
After the committee submits a report and if the Chief Justice is then of the opinion that the alleged misconduct is of a grave nature requiring removal, he will ask the judge to resign.
If the judge were to refuse, the Chief Justice will then write to the government to initiate proceedings for his/her removal by Parliament, under Article 124(4) of the Constitution.
‘Action Needed’: Kapil Sibal
Meanwhile, senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal has urged the Supreme Court to “start looking at how the appointment process (to nominate judges) takes place”.
#WATCH | Delhi | On the Supreme Court Collegium recommending transfer of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Delhi High Court to his parent High Court in Allahabad after an adverse report against him, Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal says, “…The issue of corruption… pic.twitter.com/hPQPqeT57t
— ANI (@ANI) March 21, 2025
“The issue of corruption within the judiciary is very serious… this is not something articulated by senior councils and lawyers for the first time. It has been going on for years,” he said in a video statement.
“The appointment process should be more transparent and carefully done…Corruption is a very serious issue and, despite what Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said, corruption has increased…”
With input from agencies
NDTV is now available on WhatsApp channels. Click on the link to get all the latest updates from NDTV on your chat.
