U.S. Marines Headed to Los Angeles Amid Mounting Protests Over Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

<p>In an extraordinary and controversial move, the U.S. military will temporarily deploy around 700 Marines to Los Angeles to support efforts to quell ongoing protests sparked by President Donald Trump&rsquo;s aggressive immigration enforcement. The decision, which marks a rare domestic use of military personnel, comes as the Trump administration faces mounting backlash over its immigration raids in Southern California &mdash; a flashpoint that has ignited days of unrest.</p>
<h2>Tensions between government</h2>
<p>Protests erupted after the President activated the National Guard on Saturday, escalating tensions between the federal government and California officials. Monday marked the fourth consecutive day of demonstrations, with hundreds of protesters gathering outside a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles where immigrants are being held.</p>
<p>As night fell, the LAPD and National Guard formed barricades, while officers used &ldquo;less lethal&rdquo; munitions, including tear gas, to disperse the crowd. Authorities cited reports of protesters throwing objects at officers as justification for the force, stating on X: &ldquo;Less lethal munitions may cause pain and discomfort.&rdquo;</p>
<p>In a dramatic pushback, California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Monday, challenging the legality of deploying federal troops and arguing the move infringes on state sovereignty. While the National Guard has been deployed during emergencies like natural disasters and 9/11, direct involvement of military forces in civilian policing remains extremely rare and controversial.</p>
<p>Notably, the Pentagon has stopped short of invoking the Insurrection Act, which would permit military troops to engage directly in law enforcement &mdash; a law last used during the 1992 Los Angeles riots following the Rodney King verdict.</p>
<p>As protests spread to cities across the nation, Trump doubled the National Guard deployment to 4,000 troops and backed calls by his immigration czar to consider the arrest of California Governor Gavin Newsom for allegedly obstructing immigration enforcement. &ldquo;I would do it if I were Tom,&rdquo; Trump said. &ldquo;I think it&rsquo;s great.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Democrats and civil rights advocates have sharply criticized the President&rsquo;s response, calling it an unprecedented overreach of executive power. &ldquo;The level of escalation is completely unwarranted, uncalled for, and unprecedented,&rdquo; said Newsom&rsquo;s office in a statement on X.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, protesters continue to demand the release of detained immigrants and condemn what they see as heavy-handed, militarized tactics. &ldquo;This affects every American who values freedom,&rdquo; said Marzita Cerrato, a 42-year-old first-generation immigrant protesting in Los Angeles.</p>
<p>The protests have resulted in dozens of arrests, minor injuries to both officers and protesters, and some property damage &mdash; including Waymo self-driving cars set ablaze. Demonstrations were also reported in at least nine other cities, including New York, Philadelphia, and San Francisco.</p>
<p>Federal law permits presidential deployment of troops under extreme conditions &mdash; such as invasion, insurrection, or if local authorities are unable to enforce federal law. Still, legal experts and state officials argue this threshold has not been met, raising urgent constitutional questions about the scope of presidential authority in domestic affairs.</p>